When I saw the comic on the new google chrome browser I was very excited. It seems to promise that I will never have to restart the whole browser if just one of the 10 open tabs crashes. No more 100% utilisation for heavyweight javascript sites?
My first experiences (I’ve only been playing with it for 10 minutes):
1) Doesn’t import my huge firefox visited sites history. If during the installation I ask it to import the history it just doesn’t proceed, without any error. The third time I tried to import my firefox settings I unticked the “import history” and it worked.
2) It seems to take longer to initially load up a page (I guess because it spawns a new process each time a new tab is opened and because of the javascript VM). But once the page is there, it works really well. I tried it on a couple of “heavy” sites (lots of scrolling text, flash player, animated gifs). Firefox would use 100% of the cpu, but chrome seems to work just fine.
3) The feature, which shows the 9 most visited pages when you open up a new tab seems cool initially. However, it raises privacy issues. I don’t want my employer to see that amongst my most visited site is bbc and a betting website 😉 The problem is that so far I couldn’t find an option to change the behaviour of the browser when it opens up a new tab.
4) It does eat up quite a lot of memory (I have 2 instances of chrome running, with 5 tabs of “standard” sites, such as facebook and my blog based on wordpress, on each instance and the browser eats up more than 100MB of RAM). However, when I close a tab the memory it eats up seems to decrease substantially, so it probably doesn’t have any memory leaks. And I really like the “stats for nerds” feature! 🙂
5) The tabs are part of the window and there are no big buttons and statusbar. This allows for more website content to be visible at a time and reduces the need to scroll up and down all the time.
One think is for sure. I like it so far! I still need to use it more and see how it behaves, especially from a performance point of view… It doesn’t have a spell check (yet) or any fancy plugins, but it seems to be what a browser should be… Stable and transparent! I don’t know how secure it is though… guess we’ll have to wait and see…
Update:
- I just came across my first problem… Facebook has a “read more” link, which expands long text in facebook posts. Chrome doesn’t seem to work with it 🙂
- Guess my point no. 2 above was not correct. Just tried it on: www.goalnews.gr and the flash player utilises 50% of the CPU, so I guess it was pure luck it had better performance on the other heavy on javascript/flash sites I tried it. In fact firefox’s CPU usuage didn’t peak over 20% on the same site!
- It seems that it doesn’t work well with Kaspersky antivirus. When I disabled it Chrome’s performance was greatly improved.
- Flash perfomance seems to be an issue. I have a youtube (music) video playing on another tab and the current tab becomes momentarily unresponsive from time to time.
Hey, good stuff exploring this.
From my brief scan of the comic it seems like they are targeting the new style of browsing of using web applications. I don’t think a browser like this would be compared to something like Firefox in terms of stability, speed, memory usage, etc., but rather on its greater usability with web apps. But this, I can’t see yet cos I’m on a Mac 🙁
Did you test it on Windows or Linux? I believe Windows Firefox 3.0 is VERY stable and also on the Mac.
Can you explain a bit more about how it makes web apps easier/more convenient to use?
Hey Mike,
I tried it on windows xp. My impression is that it is more stable for the following reason. I tend to open up many browser windows and tabs when I search for something on the net. I had an issue with firefox, because if a tab crashed I had to close all the windows and open tabs and start my search over again. Chrome has a task manager of its own and you can kill the tab/plugin (i.e. flash, silverlight) that is unresponsive, without affecting the rest of the tabs.
Regarding the user experience with web apps, I haven’t noticed anything special. It’s just that the user interface is minimalistic, which gives you more screen space to view a site. It’s like browsing on “full screen” all the time!